Safety Review Process
Safety pages should not pretend to guarantee perfect outcomes. Their job is to explain what was reviewed, what was inferred, what has gone stale, and how users should interpret that information.
What A Safety Review Should Include
At minimum, a page should distinguish between direct verification, external status feeds, and historical metadata that may be outdated. Those are different confidence levels and should not be presented as identical.
Review notes should emphasize update freshness, reported compatibility, and whether a page has been maintained since recent Roblox or game updates.
What The Site Should Surface Publicly
Scripts and executors should expose a status summary, a last reviewed or updated timestamp, and short notes explaining the source of that status.
Where the site relies on external feeds, that dependency should be visible so users understand that the site is aggregating information rather than claiming direct verification in every case.
How This Connects To Product
Over time, these explanations can evolve into structured review fields: tested on, reviewed by, status source, and changelog notes. That improves both trust and long-tail search relevance.